Feature Requests

Currently, it's only possible to select one clip at a time in the Layer Lane. If you've gotten into a state where there are a huge number of clips in the Layer Lane that you need to remove, being able to select multiple clips at one time would help streamline removing them (instead of deleting them individually).

I’ve been a loyal Descript customer for years, but since the new pricing structure was introduced, my monthly bill has skyrocketed from $30 to $195—despite no changes to my workflow. Frankly, this increase feels excessive. I can’t help but feel betrayed and taken advantage of. Over the years, I’ve recommended Descript to dozens of creators, but this new pricing model has left me no choice but to walk away. What once felt like an empowering tool for creators now feels like just another tech company exploiting its customers and showing them nothing but contempt. I’m genuinely disappointed and saddened by this experience.

Please make AI credits budget visible when you're in a project, not having to go to Usage to see my credits. I know you start showing them when you're running out, but you should always show them so we have a better idea of what we're using. It's a new feature and I don't want to have to constantly be doing math to understand how many credits I'm using.

I have recurring audio and images that I include for every podcast episode I produce. It takes so much time to have to add this content to each new project. I've created templates so I don't have to recreate these elements BUT would be great to be able to pull from a global user or drive media library instead. Be able to add the multitrack elements as hot buttons where you can drag and drop these elements into a project easily.

I'd like to have this done automatically when using the Descript recorder instead of having to do a bunch of work arounds to separate them.

Descript has so much potential to be an incredibly powerful tool, but the current focus on all the AI tool hype is really hurting the product. 95% of the time I try to use Underlord, it doesn't come close to a correct result, no matter how simple the request or how clear the prompt. Absolutely there are great use-cases (eye contact & auto multicam are examples that actually enhance my projects) and lots of great tools and improvements lately so I don't want to sound negative or anti-AI entirely, I'm not, but the focus lately on all marketing I've seen has been mainly generative tools that either aren't working that well or that I don't remotely need as a podcast producer (like generative video). What Descript needs most are UI and functionality improvements, not AI hype. There are countless suggestions in this community, many of which seem relatively simple to implement, that would improve the app far more than these AI tools. Just a few that come to mind now: organizing projects into folders strategizing app updates better (so it isn't constantly like "restart the app!!") further improving timeline UI so that layer height can be adjusted and vertical scrolling of layers is easier (a scroll bar, a way to control height of layer and audio bars, toggles for different types of layers like to be able to show or hide audio, etc) exporting audio from a video composition (used to be able to do it, why require another composition to be made? Then if you have to make an edit you have to do it in multiple compositions, unnecessary) exporting chapter markers (I use Buzzsprout and I've tried to submit this request over and over again) being able to adjust marker locations and scene boundaries by dragging in the timeline improving transcription accuracy improving assigning of speakers (very buggy often, always needs correcting) improving the sequence editor (very tricky to edit when there are multiple tracks) make audio editing more like a DAW to be able to control individual tracks (a bigger update but this should be a top priority since pro audio editing should be a core element of a podcast editor) returning to having actual humans respond to support requests, not AI bots I can't be the only user that wants to see my subscription fees put to these kind of things instead of towards AI tools that are highly unreliable and that I don't even need. And again, I say this as a fan and longtime user of Descript that sees so much more potential in it.

It would be great if you could 'Descriptify' this important but otherwise fiddly procedure. My sibilants are giving me a lot of grief in an otherwise superb recording using the Studio Sound feature. Thanks guys!

In the text-to-speech feature, there's no way to specify the source language and the accent of the speaker. It makes a big different in Portuguese where Brazilian and Portuguese accents are quite different. Frustratingly, the Underlord AI stubbornly claims it's able to change this, but then it doesn't actually change anything in the generated audio.

I am desperate for the ability to add multiple projects to a folder - and have a link to that folder to share with clients. I record a lot of tutorial videos and the fact that theres no home for the videos - so they just get lost in the abyss after being sent is a deal breaker for me. if descript doesnt add this feature soon ill be jumping ship.

When users gather in open feedback spaces, they bring lived experience into the design process. Discussions around term life insurance leadshttps: //lifeinsuranceleadgenagency.co.uk/services/term/ often show how specific, real-world needs surface through thoughtful community input. These conversations reveal patterns that structured surveys often fail to capture. People explain what slows them down, what feels intuitive, and what causes friction. The value lies not in volume, but in clarity of shared experience. Feedback boards thrive because they encourage reflection rather than reaction. Contributors usually describe context before suggesting change. That context helps teams understand the “why” behind a request. Over time, repeated themes begin to form a quiet roadmap. This roadmap is shaped by everyday use rather than abstract planning. It reflects how tools behave outside ideal scenarios. Small workflow issues become visible through repeated mention. Accessibility concerns gain weight when echoed by many voices. Language, usability, and flexibility emerge as recurring priorities. These insights are rarely dramatic, yet deeply influential. They guide incremental improvements that compound over time. Community discussion also builds shared ownership. Users feel heard when ideas are acknowledged. That sense of participation strengthens trust. Trust encourages more thoughtful contributions. Thoughtful contributions raise the overall quality of dialogue. The result is a living archive of practical knowledge. Such spaces show that progress is collaborative. Listening carefully is often the most effective form of innovation.